American Police State
Legion Miracle
  • Home
  • Police State Blog
  • Freedom Forum
  • Police Militarization
  • Occupy Wolverine
  • Occupy The World
  • Martial Law
  • Fredom through Music
  • Resistance & Revolution
  • Contact Webmaster
  • Privacy Policy

Who controls the seed supply?

7/25/2013

4 Comments

 
Picture
     Since the mid-1990s just five biotech giants; Monsanto, Syngenta, Bayer, Dow and DuPont, have bought up more than 200 other companies between them in an attempt to dominate our access to seeds, especially organic and heirloom.
     Philip Howard from Michigan State University produced a unique visual to illustrate this growing concentration of power in the hands of a few companies. Howard also says that the takeover of the seed market has been 'dramatic' and that it is growingg harder for farmers to find alternatives. 
     In the US for example, where 90 per cent of the soybeans grown are genetically-modified varieties, many conventional farmers have had difficulty obtaining non-genetically modified seeds to plant. 
     Howard says the increasing power of seed companies is 'incompatible' with renewable agricultural practices such as saving and replanting seeds. He says one solution to restricting their control would be through banning the practice of granting patents on seeds, plants and genes.
     A patent gives a company exclusive rights to sell and develop a new invention. In the case of patents on plants and genes it grants them temporary monopolies and bans farmers from saving seeds, forcing them to buy new seeds from the company each year or pay a license to use patented seeds they have saved.
     Howard and others argue that 'excessive seed patenting' by the biotech giants is allowing them to control a large number of seeds and leading to an increase in seed prices and a decrease of seed choices for farmers.
     The groundbreaking IAASTD report in 2008 conducted by 400 scientists from around the world, criticized patents for driving up costs and restricting experimentation by farmers in developing countries.
     A report, 'Future of seeds and food', published last year by a coalition of campaign groups, including Greenpeace, called for an end to patents on seeds to halt the domination of biotech giants like Syngenta. It says only bigger seed companies can afford to apply and enforce a patent.
     'Patents exacerbate genetic erosion as they promote monoculture by hindering the development of new seed varieties. In sum, the possible, long term consequences of patents are control of the whole food chain by a few companies,' said the report.
     'What is needed most is a clear legal ruling that exempts seeds and farm animals from patent protection.

4 Comments
college paper link
4/26/2016 02:04:39 am

The seed patenting helps to increase their prices. And this does not carry any benefit to farmers. So I think that the abolition of the patent is the right step in the seed supply.

Reply
http://custom-writing.services/ link
6/9/2016 11:04:56 am

Your poster as provoking as your article. Maybe with these patents companies will be able to create something extraordinary, but do we need it indeed?

Reply
paper-writing.services link
8/25/2016 11:27:47 pm

The issue ia very important for the farmers. It is very important to have good seeds.

Reply
leading on line custom writing services link
2/16/2018 03:44:25 am

Agriculture is very important thing nowadays. I think that it is the main aim for farmers to get good seeds.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Archives

    November 2017
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011

    RSS Feed

    QoinPro.com: Free Bitcoins every 24 hours
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.