Who controls the seed supply?
Since the mid-1990s just five biotech giants; Monsanto, Syngenta, Bayer, Dow and DuPont, have bought up more than 200 other companies between them in an attempt to dominate our access to seeds, especially organic and heirloom.
Philip Howard from Michigan State University produced a unique visual to illustrate this growing concentration of power in the hands of a few companies. Howard also says that the takeover of the seed market has been 'dramatic' and that it is growingg harder for farmers to find alternatives.
In the US for example, where 90 per cent of the soybeans grown are genetically-modified varieties, many conventional farmers have had difficulty obtaining non-genetically modified seeds to plant.
Howard says the increasing power of seed companies is 'incompatible' with renewable agricultural practices such as saving and replanting seeds. He says one solution to restricting their control would be through banning the practice of granting patents on seeds, plants and genes.
A patent gives a company exclusive rights to sell and develop a new invention. In the case of patents on plants and genes it grants them temporary monopolies and bans farmers from saving seeds, forcing them to buy new seeds from the company each year or pay a license to use patented seeds they have saved.
Howard and others argue that 'excessive seed patenting' by the biotech giants is allowing them to control a large number of seeds and leading to an increase in seed prices and a decrease of seed choices for farmers.
The groundbreaking IAASTD report in 2008 conducted by 400 scientists from around the world, criticized patents for driving up costs and restricting experimentation by farmers in developing countries.
A report, 'Future of seeds and food', published last year by a coalition of campaign groups, including Greenpeace, called for an end to patents on seeds to halt the domination of biotech giants like Syngenta. It says only bigger seed companies can afford to apply and enforce a patent.
'Patents exacerbate genetic erosion as they promote monoculture by hindering the development of new seed varieties. In sum, the possible, long term consequences of patents are control of the whole food chain by a few companies,' said the report.
'What is needed most is a clear legal ruling that exempts seeds and farm animals from patent protection.
4/26/2016 02:04:39 am
The seed patenting helps to increase their prices. And this does not carry any benefit to farmers. So I think that the abolition of the patent is the right step in the seed supply.
6/9/2016 11:04:56 am
Your poster as provoking as your article. Maybe with these patents companies will be able to create something extraordinary, but do we need it indeed?
8/25/2016 11:27:47 pm
The issue ia very important for the farmers. It is very important to have good seeds.
2/16/2018 03:44:25 am
Agriculture is very important thing nowadays. I think that it is the main aim for farmers to get good seeds.
Leave a Reply.