A bill that would open up previously secret Federal Reserve deliberations to scrutiny by members of Congress passed the House of Representatives today. The measure, authored by longtime Fed critic Rep. Ron Paul was approved on a vote of 327 to 98. The Fed opposes the bill, which would allow audits of the central bank's monetary policy operations. The Fed now releases a summary of its interest rate-setting meetings after three weeks, but does not release a full transcript for five years. The measure faces long odds in the Democrat-controlled Senate. 

  

     Earlier this month Ron Paul announced that he will not be seeking reelection after 24 years in Congress. Paul said he will now focus the rest of his time on his presidential bid, but will serve out the rest of his term through December 2012. On the “off chance” that he doesn’t win the presidency, will retire.
     Ron Paul definitely knows how to go out with a bang; 2012 has been a banner year in Paul’s career, in which his transformation from a fringe Republican whose hardcore Libertarian ideals rendered him largely irrelevant in the national dialogue to a Grassroots Leader that created a bona fide passionate political movement. Paul is still the only candidate in 2012 to have raised the same kind of grass-roots enthusiasm that Obama did in 2008.
     As Politico notes, today marks something of a swan song for Ron Paul: his Audit the Fed bill finally hits the floor of the House for a vote.
     Ending the Fed entirely has been a pillar of Paul’s economic prescriptions for the country which includes returning to the gold standard for years. Although he may not be successful in his bid to actually end the Fed, today’s vote on Audit the Fed represents a triumph for Paul. He is finally having his ideas take hold in the mainstream Republican establishment.
Part of this, of course, is good timing. Since Obama’s election Paul has benefitted from a cultural shift of the country’s right, which has leaned more toward the Libertarian principles of limited government and free-market purism.
     To that end, Politico points out that many Democrats are unsettled by Audit the Fed. “There is an audit of the Fed done every year,” says Rep Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO). “It’s not what Dr. Paul prefers, but I think the public has been misled in believing there’s no accountability.”
     Audit the Fed means to increase transparency and oversight over how the Fed makes monetary policy in order to keep it on a tighter leash. Rep Whip Steny Hoyer said, “It will undermine the independence of the Federal Reserve and will, therefore, undermine the competence in the Federal Reserve, which plays a significant role in stabilizing the economy and addressing the creation of jobs.”
     Politico also notes that while the bill is likely to pass in the House with 270 sponsors, it doesn’t stand a chance in the Senate, where Majority Leader Harry Reid won’t entertain bringing it up for a vote.
     Earlier this month, acknowledging his legislative fights would have to endure after his retirement, he said “I’d like to say that we’re on the verge of total victory, we’re not. We’re on an incremental victory.”
     Still, Audit the Fed represents a moment in the spotlight not only for Paul but for the influence his ideals have gained.

     Imagine a world where the people that run the radio, the phone, the internet, and the TV have the right to enter your home without permission…Stop imagining because it’s real; if you have a wireless router, cordless phone, remote car-door opener, baby monitor, cellphone, or any other device that uses RF energy in your house, the FCC claims they have right to enter your home without a warrant at any time, day or night, in order to inspect it.
     That’s the upshot of the rules this agency has followed for years in their monitoring of licensed television and radio stations, and to crack down on pirate radio broadcasters. The commission maintains that the same policy applies to any licensed or unlicensed radio-frequency device.
     “Anything using RF energy; we have the right to inspect it to make sure it is not causing interference,” says FCC spokesman David Fiske. That includes devices like Wi-Fi routers that use unlicensed spectrum, Fiske says.
     The FCC makes its claim that it derives its warrantless search power from the Communications Act of 1934. However, the constitutionality of the claim has gone untested in court. That’s largely because the FCC has had little to do with average citizens for most of the last 75 years. During this period home transmitters were largely reserved to ham-radio operators and CB-radio aficionados. As of 2009 though, nearly every household in the United States has multiple devices that use radio waves, falling under the FCC’s purview, and making the commission’s claimed authority ripe for a court challenge.
     “It is a major stretch beyond case law to assert that authority with respect to a private home, which is at the heart of the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable search and seizure,” says Electronic Frontier Foundation lawyer Lee Tien. “When it is a private home and when you are talking about an over-powered Wi-Fi antenna; the idea they could just go in is honestly quite bizarre.”
     George Washington University professor Orin Kerr, a constitutional law expert, has also questioned the legality of the policy. “The Supreme Court has said that the government can’t make warrantless entries into homes for administrative inspections,” Kerr said via e-mail, referring to a 1967 Supreme Court ruling that housing inspectors needed warrants to force their way into private residences. Kerr added that the FCC’s online FAQ doesn’t explain how the agency gets around that ruling.
     The rules came to attention when an FCC agent investigating a pirate radio station in Boulder, Colorado, left a copy of a 2005 FCC Inspection Policy on the door of a residence hosting the unlicensed 100-watt transmitter. “Whether you operate an amateur station or any other radio device, your authorization from the Commission comes with the obligation to allow inspection,” the statement says.
     The notice spooked those running “Boulder Free Radio,” who thought it was just tough talk intended to scare them into shutting down. According to one of the station’s leaders, who spoke to Wired.com on condition of anonymity. “This is an intimidation thing,” he said. “Most people aren’t that dedicated to the cause. I’m not going to let them into my house.”
     Refusing the FCC admittance can carry a harsh financial penalty though. In a 2007 case, a man from Corpus Christi Texas got a visit from the FCC’s direction-finders after rebroadcasting an AM radio station through a CB radio in his home. An FCC agent tracked the signal to his house and asked to see the equipment; Donald Winton refused to let him in, but did turn off the radio. Winton was later fined $7,000 for refusing entry to the agent. The fine was reduced to $225 after he proved he had little income.
     Administrative search powers are not rare, at least as directed against businesses. Fire-safety, food and workplace-safety regulators, and health inspectors generally don’t need warrants to enter a business. And despite the broad power, the FCC agents aren’t cops, says Fiske. “The only right they have is to inspect the equipment,” Fiske says. “If they want to seize, they have to work with the U.S. Attorney’s office.”
     But if inspectors should notice evidence of unrelated criminal behavior, perhaps a cannabis plant or stolen property, a Supreme Court decision suggests the search can be used against the resident. In the 1987 case New York v. Burger, two police officers performed a warrantless administrative search of one Joseph Burger’s automobile junkyard. When he couldn’t produce the proper paperwork, the officers searched the grounds and found stolen vehicles, which they used to prosecute him. The Supreme Court held the search to be legal.
     In the meantime, pirate radio stations are adapting to the FCC’s warrantless search power by dividing up a station’s operations. For instance, Boulder Free Radio. consists of an online radio station operated by DJs from a remote studio. Miles away, a small computer streams the online station and feeds it to the transmitter. Once the FCC comes and leaves a notice on the door, the transmitter is simply moved to another location before the agent returns.